Sunday, 29 March 2015

Here is how we "apparently" feel about correct and unaltered court transcripts. ( blog 90)

I have been saying this for like 2 years, altering transcripts and what not. You can argue with the Chief Justice......In his own words from another case not connected to my own.

" As to your concern that the initial transcript did not contain the comments regarding the preparation of the order, that was inadvertent and had no relevance to the substantial portion of the application"

Anything and everything is of relevance inside a court case and should be adequately transcribed.( after all is this not the arena in which we attempt to discover the truth and adequately apply the proper punishment if found in guilt) When we decide that in any division of the justice department that we have the right to omit certain portions of a trial becomes only more evidentiary clear that the system has begun to bring Hollywood of sorts to the court rooms and buttons up misspellings, wrongful acts and perverts justice in whole. Isn't it ironic that a person is sworn under oath to " tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth" yet the transcriptions of that event are edited to their advantage. This is not justice and it is no more less than what we accuse so called 3rd World Nations of doing.