Not sure when. Thought it would have long ago like when we did what is called an "Askov hearing" which relates to delay of trial as the trial proper should have been finalized in max 12 months as one has the "right to a speedy trial" but the judge bought into the crowns lies that it "is an extremely complex trial, with many police officers to schedule to testify among other things.
The judge ruled that despite I being diagnosed with P.T.S.D because of it all, the trial must go on and be concluded in the allotted three days scheduled for the matter. He then asked both the defense and crown lawyers if 3 days was enough because if more time is needed then he wants to know. They both readily agreed that yes it was enough time.
Trial proper went 4 days and then they took an over 3 month recess. On Thursday the last witness was to be called 'the CBC video camera man', and he was. The reason he was called was because ALL the police lie and say that "none of them ever seen a cameraman" and they said so under oath. Well the camera man has now testified "that in fact he was always 6 to 7 feet away from police" Pretty hard to miss someone that close with a shoulder held video camera wouldn't you say?" He goes on to say that there is MUCH more video evidence other then the 10 seconds they gave us, its the property of the CBC, else it has been destroyed." The police say this because they failed to do a proper investigation and cease or get a copy of the video as part of a proper investigation. Incidentally, I lived above a grocery store which had literally dozens of video cameras that could have caught most of the events on video. In the hallways and entrances are near another dozen video cameras, yet they ( the police ) ALL claim that they " seen no video cameras" Which is yet another lie and I not only photographed all the cameras myself and they were introduced into evidence but I also know that police were aware of the cameras as they have requested footage from the owner before for video evidence in none related issues with law and courts against others. This is now day 5 of trial proper concluding with my lawyer arguing that my constitutional rights were egregiously violated and one example of that is that Staff sergeant S, Carter had threatened to kill me as he had admitted to being angry and stating such a thing under oath. They Have now recessed and the judge has stated that "trial proper will resume on April 12, 2015, where he will render his decision on the judicial stay and any other matters should it go past there. So what was argued as a delay of trial in November has in fact carried out until may 12,2015, which is what? A little over 5 months more. Seem legitimate to you?